Kermit the Blog

Welcome to my pad.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Conservatism: Not just a good idea, it's the (Natural) Law.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Well, They Sure Keep the Food Warm



From WORLD, September 6, 2008:

Before you upgrade your kitchen countertops to granite, you might want to have it tested for radon and radiation. According to The New York Times, some of the more exotic granites coming from places like Brazil and Namibia emit radiation higher than background levels, in some cases 100 times as high. Experts debate whether the "hot" countertops are a cancer risk, but the Times reports that personal injury lawyers are already advertising for clients. The website http://epa.gov/radon has more information.

I had already written off natural stone countertops for our future house because I know I wouldn't keep up the maintenance they require.

Homeowners, don't take your formica for granite.

Monday, September 08, 2008

This Day in History


September 8, 1966: The starship Enterprise begins its five-year mission, only to be cut short at three years.

I was exactly six months old and probably saw the premiere, but it remains only a subconscious, black-and-white memory. (Our house didn't go color until 1981.)



Follow-up:

I just discovered another notable event that happened on this date.

September 8, 1947: C.S. Lewis appeared on the cover of Time magazine. The cover story focused on Lewis' book The Screwtape Letters, a collection of correspondences between a demon and his superior about means and methods of temptation. Its brilliant premise intrigued readers who would otherwise yawn over treatises on Christian apologetics. The book is regarded as a classic by Christian and secular audiences. Forty years later, I read it myself for the first time. Further Up and Further In published a review of Screwtape and the Time magazine article.

Labels: , ,

NOprah





Oprah Winfrey has responded to reports that she refused to invite Sarah Palin on her show, saying she said she would be happy to invite Palin on, after the election.

Says Oprah:

"At the beginning of this presidential campaign when I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates. I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over."


But:

Winfrey used her show to introduce Barack Obama to America's women voters, and has endorsed and campaigned with the Democratic nominee. She also was very visible at Obama's acceptance speech last week in Denver.


Oprah's fans are not pleased and are saying so in comments posted on Oprah's own site:

Oprah, you just lost a lot of credibility. If Sarah Palin was a Democrat, or on Obama's ticket, she likely would be on your show, and most people realize the double standard you are advocating. And to say there has been "absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show" is very hard to believe.

Go ahead and keep her off the show. You will be contributing to the public's backlash to the media that will sweep McCain/Palin into the White House.

I can tell you that Sarah is very popular. I know several women who are voting for McCain as a direct result of Sarah Palin. These are educated, intelligent and independent women, not women who will vote for any woman candidate. Several of them were intending to vote for Obama, but now will vote McCain/Palin.


Another (former) fan said:

I have been a huge fan for many of my years. But I disassociate myself with anything Oprah from now on. You truly irked me when you threw Obama to the media forefront for your own personal gain and to suffocate us with your political position...


Laura Ingraham, on her radio show this morning, said that Oprah has always claimed to support "strong" women. Citing political rants on Winfrey's show during the 2004 election by activist actresses like Cameron Diaz, Ingraham said Oprah's support is obviously limited to "strong, liberal, ditzy Hollywood women." Ingraham proposed an updated version of the "NOBama" t-shirts for Oprah's mutineers, with "NOprah" on the back.

Labels: , ,

Friday, September 05, 2008

Rebels Without a Clue





I hardly want to give any attention to the anti-war protesters gathered (and arrested) in St. Paul this week because as a whole they have no credibility. But on the status of Iraq, here's a headline to ponder:

Nearly 125 Shot Dead In Chicago Over Summer
Total Is About Double The Death Toll In Iraq


CHICAGO (CBS) -- An estimated 123 people were shot and killed over the summer. That's nearly double the number of soldiers killed in Iraq over the same time period. ...

According to the Defense Department, 65 soldiers were killed in combat in Iraq. About the same number were killed in Afghanistan over that same period.

In the same time period, an estimated 245 people were shot and wounded in the city.


Though I won't dwell on this, it's worth noting the higher death toll is in the home town of anti-war candidate Barack Obama.

But to the St. Paul protesters, my point is: this is not your father's war. Vietnam was lost largely because doomsayers in the press managed to demoralize a nation and its military, and protesters waged war against their own country. Your deplorable behavior yesterday shows who is living in a fantasy. You think it's still 1968. People know more and know better today, and supporters of the war in Iraq were determined not to let history repeat itself. The surge is working, as even Rep. John Murtha conceded. Crime is up in Chicago, down in Iraq.

It's time to give up the tired old canard about Bush making up lies to lead us into war. (And get your own story straight - is Bush a babbling idiot, or a deviously brilliant shyster who hoodwinked the world into war? Make up your mind.) The President didn't make up the WMD photos and reports that leaders around the world accepted as evidence of an international threat. Whether the grains of truth in those reports were sufficient justification alone, no one argued Hussein wasn't a dirty fighter. Saddam Hussein thumbed his nose at the U.N., who routinely passes meaningless resolutions it has neither the guts nor the know-how to enforce. Whether Hussein had WMDs yet, he was building them, and he was crazy enough to use them. To put the stakes in perspective, imagine how many lives could have been saved if Hitler had been stopped sooner. We will never know how many lives were saved because Hussein was stopped, pursued, captured, then tried and sentenced by his own people.

And now, freedom is blooming in Iraq. Like it or not, lives are being saved by this war. There has been no mass chemical-bombing of Kurds since April 2003. Schools, hospitals, public infrastructure, and houses of worship are being rebuilt with American help, as they were in Germany following World War II. This is what we do. Yes, the Iraq death toll is tragic, but nowhere near what our enemies want it to be. And for the record, we're the ones trying to keep the count low.

Protesters, let's be introspective: For most of you, "anti-war" is a convenient position to take when you really just disagree with someone's personal morality or politics. That's why we didn't see you when Clinton sent troops to Bosnia and Kosovo. Your hatred for Bush and conservatives has almost nothing, if anything, to do with war. Be honest and go march with NARAL or the nearest anti-Israel rally.

For those of you remaining who are sincerely against war itself and are not blinded by personal hatred of conservatives (you would be the peaceful ones who don't actually commit violence to promote your cause), I understand you because in my pacifist days I made the same arguments, namely that war is the recourse of knuckle-dragging bullies who don't have the intelligence to resolve conflicts with kind words and hugs. I once declared myself a conscientious objector and told an army recruiter I would not kill people to solve problems because I knew a better solution.

My pacifism (anti-war and anti-gun) was drawn directly from my Christian faith, though I was more than a little snide in how I preached it. But over my adult life, reason led me reluctantly to some conclusions:

Bad people don't listen to reason. That's one reason they're bad. When bad people have guns, you need guns to stop them. Stopping bad people from killing and enslaving people saves lives. "Freedom, Justice, and Equality" don't come from dictatorships, they come from democracy. When tyrants are in power, liberty is seldom if ever achieved through negotiation.

This is not philosophy, this is history. Here's the philosophy:

"We believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace."

I learned this from a President I once derided as warmonger and now revere as one of the greatest American heroes of all time, Ronald Reagan.

Sen. McCain said unequivocally last night, "I hate war." I agree. Any reasonable person does. War is evil, but it can be the only means to overcome the greater evil of tyranny. And as a matter of definition, peace without liberty is tyranny. Even a tyrant can achieve peace at the expense of liberty, but such a society is inhuman. This is not how we were meant to live.

So those of you rare sincere pacifists, please consider carefully the logic of your blanket criticisms against war. In principle, I appreciate your rationale, but I ask you look seriously at whether war has historically in the end reduced the loss of life. Lives saved by liberty cannot be measured, but compare the lives lost in WWII, for instance, to the lives lost through the quiet tyranny of the former Soviet Union and other Communist regimes. If only by such numbers, assess the logic of whether war, however evil, can result and has resulted in eventual good.

If you'll acknowledge this, we can talk.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, September 04, 2008

Reaganesque



It's hard to find a better single word to describe Sarah Palin's speech last night.

Palin's combination of boldness, clarity, humor, confidence, and authenticity was something we've hardly seen from a candidate in twenty-five years.

A Democratic critic claimed he observed Palin intently watching the teleprompter when she spoke about international issues, thereby demonstrating her inexperience in speaking on such matters. Sure. It turns out the teleprompter kept scrolling during periods of extended applause, occasionally scrolling past the point where Palin was to continue. So she resumed her speech - from memory!

None of this was obvious to those of us watching at home. Palin had poise, finesse, and charisma, and could deliver unscripted wit worthy of the Great Communicator himself: "What's the difference between a pitbull and a hocky mom? Lipstick." Then she'd return to the fickle telepromter without missing a beat.

In contrast, those of you who saw CBS's coverage might have caught Katie Couric's gaffe in which she referred to Palin as the governor of Arkansas. I almost disbelieved my ears until it was confirmed by the closed-captions a few seconds later.

My Top Eight Favorite Quotes from Sarah Palin's Acceptance Speech

8. "I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a 'community organizer,' except that you have actual responsibilities."

7. "... we don't quite know what to make of a candidate who lavishes praise on working people when they are listening, and then talks about how bitterly they cling to their religion and guns when those people aren't listening. We tend to prefer candidates who don't talk about us one way in Scranton and another way in San Francisco."

6. "... there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers. And then there are those, like John McCain, who use their careers to promote change. They're the ones whose names appear on laws and landmark reforms, not just on buttons and banners, or on self-designed presidential seals."

5. "... listening to [Obama] speak, it's easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform — not even in the state Senate."

4. "This is a man who can give an entire speech about the wars America is fighting, and never use the word 'victory' except when he's talking about his own campaign. "

3. "... When the cloud of rhetoric has passed ... when the roar of the crowd fades away ... when the stadium lights go out, and those Styrofoam Greek columns are hauled back to some studio lot - what exactly is our opponent's plan? What does he actually seek to accomplish, after he's done turning back the waters and healing the planet? The answer is to make government bigger ... take more of your money ... give you more orders from Washington ... and to reduce the strength of America in a dangerous world."

2. "My fellow citizens, the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of 'personal discovery.' This world of threats and dangers is not just a community, and it doesn't just need an organizer."

1. "... though both Senator Obama and Senator Biden have been going on lately about how they are always 'fighting for you,' let us face the matter squarely. There is only one man in this election who has ever really fought for you."


I urge anyone to read the full text of what I believe will be remembered as an historic speech, keeping in mind this was only the script. You won't find the pitbull joke.

Labels: